Today, I’m going to throw some questions out there that have been running through my mind for the last couple of weeks, some resulting from discussions I’ve had with friends. I’d greatly appreciate your feedback on them.
Q#1: Do you believe that all sins are equal? If not, why?
Q#2: Do you believe that you cannot change who you are at your core?
Q#3: What is it that dictates who you are?
Q#4: Do you believe that your actions dictate or indicate who you are?
Q#5: What in your opinion, does the scriptures mean when it says that Christ is returning for a church without spot or wrinkle?
Q#6: Do you think it is possible for us to exist on this planet, in the flesh without spot or wrinkle?
Q#7: When scripture refers to someone being “perfect,” what does that mean?
Q#8: Is perfection possible while we are in the flesh?
Q#9: We all have a past and issues that we have struggled with. In growing up in levels in God, do you feel that you become immune to those past struggles? Do you feel that you would never have the same struggles again in the same areas again?
Q#10: Do you think that when people are having an ongoing struggle with a particular area of sin, that due to this area of fallen-ness, they will miss God when He returns?
Q#11: Would your answer above, depend on the area of sin that was the issue? If so, please refer back to Q#1, and give me your revised answer here.
Q#12: Is there a difference between sin and “the works of the flesh?” If so, what is the difference?
Q#13: Gal 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are [these]; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
Gal 5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
Gal 5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told [you] in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
If a believer is struggling in any of these “works of the flesh,” are they unforgiven, despite the blood of Christ?
Q#14: If sin is sin, why are these “works of the flesh” singled out and, it seems, stated as being beyond salvation?
I’m not advocating this by any means, but those scriptures came up recently in a study at church, and I started wondering. It makes me think that some sins are designated as greater than others the way society dictates, while pastors claim they are all the same, yet the church acts just like society does about them. So if they are all the same, and we all sin and fall short of the glory of God, then why are these specifically mentioned like this?
None of us are good, and we can never be. It’s just like none of us can tell where we will be tomorrow, and which of these sins we may fall into. It really depends largely on our personal history and background, and what we’ve struggled with in the past.
I’ve discovered that you can do well in an area of weakness for several years, get relaxed and think you’ve got this, and then suddenly relapse into something that seems to be the worse variant of your weakness that you’ve ever experienced. In such cases, I wonder how can one be struggling in one area so much, and still represent God in any area, way or fashion. Does the particular sin struggle dictate whether or not someone can still be effective for God?
I’m thinking about the fact that the bible is not just a book of instruction for what’s right versus wrong, but it is also a book of sinners. So when I look at Job, who was a “righteous man” yet still walked in fear; when I look at David, who was God’s beloved, yet still committed several of the sins listed in the above verses; I wonder. Did these guys pass the test of life, despite having fallen in a few of these areas?
If Job’s faith was perfect, despite his fear, then that makes me think that if any one of us falls into any of those arenas of sin based on fear…yet still have perfect faith, would we still miss God?
The only way I can think that Job represented God in that circumstance, is in the fact that he did not waver in his faith, yet he was in complete desolation and destitution. Likewise, David had no communication with God while he committed his sins concerning Bathsheba, yet was able to repent. His sins did not go without consequence, but he was still God’s beloved, so that makes me think that despite his mistakes, he made in into heaven. And think about Paul. Paul struggled with pride. Is that any less than the sins listed? Yet Paul is the one that the church pushes us to follow.
None of us is perfect, so how can any of us, with spot and wrinkle get in the gates? I know the blood covers us, but if I’m reading the above scriptures correctly, that is saying that the blood is not enough, and if we were guilty of any of those listed sins, we still would not make it in. Am I wrong? Just stuff I’m pondering. What’s your opinion? Can you give me any scriptural basis or backup for what you state? Thanks for the feedback.
Recent Comments