2 Chronicles 34 Part 9

  • 2 Chronicles 34 Part 9

    1Ki 13:18    He said unto him, I [am] a prophet also as thou [art]; and an angel spake unto me by the word of the LORD, saying, Bring him back with thee into thine house, that he may eat bread and drink water. [But] he lied unto him.
    1Ki 13:19    So he went back with him, and did eat bread in his house, and drank water.
    1Ki 13:20    And it came to pass, as they sat at the table, that the word of the LORD came unto the prophet that brought him back:
    1Ki 13:21    And he cried unto the man of God that came from Judah, saying, Thus saith the LORD, Forasmuch as thou hast disobeyed the mouth of the LORD, and hast not kept the commandment which the LORD thy God commanded thee,
    1Ki 13:22    But camest back, and hast eaten bread and drunk water in the place, of the which [the LORD] did say to thee, Eat no bread, and drink no water; thy carcase shall not come unto the sepulchre of thy fathers.
    1Ki 13:23    And it came to pass, after he had eaten bread, and after he had drunk, that he saddled for him the ass, [to wit], for the prophet whom he had brought back.

    I’m just going to note a few things I see in this story. First of all, ain’t it just like the devil to slam one of us with an attack immediately following a great victory?

    The man of God had fulfilled his commission to go and prophesy against that evil king, and foretell of the coming of Josiah. We never hear of this prophet again, so I have to conclude that his mission was fulfilled.

    Since he was a lesser known prophet, I have to wonder if this was his first and only commission from God. We never heard of this guy before this incident, and we never hear of him afterwards.

    Secondly, look at the enemy’s attack. First, he uses an old, alleged prophet; one that apparently had fallen by the wayside. His age alone might garner some measure of respect from the younger, and obviously more inexperienced prophet.

    The fact that this person stated that he too was a “prophet,” like the man of God, gave them a kinship that the younger more inexperienced one would also associate with.

    However, regardless of any such associations, one must always check the fruit. Furthermore, if you have been given a command or commission from God and someone else, even a prophet, pastor, or other elder in the church tells you to do something that contradicts or disobeys it, you should seek God first, but ultimately, you should trust in the word that God gave you.

    This man of God apparently trusted more in the “association” with this alleged prophet, than he did in the word that God had given him, and I believe that is why he was slain.

    “His offence was great, and it would by no means justify him that he was drawn into it by a lie; he could not be so certain of the countermand sent by another as he was of the command given to himself, nor had he any ground to think that the command would be recalled, when the reason of it remained in force, which was that he might testify his detestation of the wickedness of that place.” (commentary of Matthew Henry)

    Additionally, remember that the man of God had stated to the king that he could not eat or drink in that land; in Bethel, where the king was, yet at this alleged prophet’s invitation, he disobeyed the words he had spoken. This put Gods word into question and His integrity as well, and God will not abide his integrity being violated or thrown into question.

    “He had great reason to suspect the honesty of this old prophet, who did not himself bear his testimony, nor did God think fit to make use of him as a witness against the idolatry of the city he lived in. However, he should have taken time to beg direction from God, and not have complied so soon. Did he think this old prophet’s house safer to eat in than other houses at Beth-el, when God had forbidden him to eat in any? That was to refine upon the command, and make himself wiser than God. Did he think to excuse himself that he was hungry? Had he never read that man lives not by bread alone?”  (commentary of Matthew Henry)

    What I wonder is what did this man of God think, once he realized he was deceived? There is no evidence that he said anything. In fact, it seems like he kept on eating, with no response. I mean, in a moment like that, you gotta wonder what’s goin’ through the guy’s mind.